The Four-Part Functional Classification of Grammar: A Linguistic Perspective for English Language Educators ©

by Jasmin Cowin, Ed.D.

Conceptualization and Design Intent

The spark behind this design stems from my observation that conventional grammar instruction often creates artificial boundaries between grammatical elements rather than highlighting their interconnected functions. By reconceptualizing grammar as a system of terminal elements, auxiliary elements, modifiers, and connectors, I sought to create a visual metalinguistic tool that would facilitate deeper cognitive engagement with language structures across varying proficiency levels.

Theoretical Foundations: An Integrated Approach

The four-component model deliberately integrates complementary theoretical perspectives:

The Dependency Perspective: Drawing from Tesnière’s (1959) seminal work, this framework emphasizes relational characteristics over categorical classifications. Terminal elements establish semantic foundations upon which auxiliary elements construct grammatical meaning, modifiers refine conceptual boundaries, and connectors create hierarchical relationships—mirroring the valency patterns and dependency structures that Tesnière identified as fundamental to syntactic organization.

The Functional Perspective: Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar provides the theoretical underpinning for examining how each component serves specific communicative purposes. Terminal elements primarily fulfill ideational functions; auxiliary elements negotiate interpersonal dimensions through tense, mood, and aspect; modifiers enhance textual richness; and connectors organize logical coherence between propositions—all operating simultaneously across what Halliday termed the “metafunctions” of language.

The Structural Perspective: From Chomskyan X-bar theory, this model adapts the concept of hierarchical constituency. The classification systematically maps onto phrase structure configurations where terminal elements function as heads, auxiliary elements as functional projections, modifiers as adjuncts, and connectors as complementizers and relational markers—creating a bridge between transformational grammar and functional applications.

1. Enhanced Sentence Analysis Teachers can guide students in breaking down sentences by identifying:

  • Terminal elements (primary content words)
  • Auxiliary elements (grammatical markers for tense, aspect, etc.)
  • Modifiers (descriptive elements that refine meaning)
  • Connectors (elements that establish relationships)

2. Comparative Language Analysis The focus on function rather than form makes this approach useful for:

  • Comparing how grammatical functions manifest across different languages
  • Helping multilingual students connect new structures to familiar concepts
  • Discussing similarities and differences between L1 and English grammar

Meta-participation and ethical transparency in role-playing games: Examining AI and algorithmic influence 

I am grateful to our collaborative, transdisciplinary and international work with Dr. Cristo Leon, Ph.D., James Lipuma, and Mauricio Rangel-Jimenez.
🚨 “Meta-participation and ethical transparency in role-playing games: Examining AI and algorithmic influence.”   Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and other non-human participants in role-playing games (RPGs) has brought new dimensions to interactive storytelling and game design. As
AI evolves to simulate human-like interactions more convincingly, its role in games raises significant ethical questions, particularly regarding transparency and player agency. This paper critically examines these issues, focusing on the concept of the meta-participant—the programmer or author responsible for designing the AI’s decision-making algorithms—
and the implications of their invisible influence and personal bias on the gaming experience of human players.
Leon, C., Lipuma, J., Cowin, J., & Rangel-Jimenez, M. (2025). Meta-participation and ethical transparency in role-playing games: Examining AI and algorithmic influence [Peer-reviewed journal]. STEM for Success Resources(101). https://lnkd.in/eHSifda7

Touro University TESOL candidate Anastasios Panagiotidis’ Discussion Board on SIOP

Touro University TESOL: EDDN 637 – Second Language Learners and the Content Areas

Students will become acquainted with and practice effective approaches, methods, and strategies for teaching and evaluating English language learners in the content areas (ELA, social studies, math and science). Throughout the course, students will explore the impact of culture and language on classroom learning. Special challenges in teaching and assessment in each content area will also be discussed. Includes 15 hours of field work.

Anastasios Panagiotidis is a dedicated high school Earth Science teacher serving the South Huntington Union Free School District. As he approaches his tenure year at the age of 25, he recognizes that his career is still in its early stages. However, his passion for education and commitment to fostering a supportive and inclusive learning environment drive his work every day. Inspired by the culturally and academically diverse student population he teaches, he strives to design engaging, student-centered lessons that not only address individual needs but also connect learning to real-world contexts. His ultimate goal is to ensure that every student, regardless of their language proficiency or academic abilities, has the opportunity to reach their fullest potential under his instruction.

The SIOP Model: An Essential Framework for ESL Instruction by Prof. Dr. Jasmin Cowin

The Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) is a research-based instructional model designed to support English Learners (ELs) in developing both content knowledge and English language proficiency simultaneously. Developed by Echevarria, Vogt, and Short, the SIOP model provides a structured approach to lesson planning and delivery, ensuring that ELs receive comprehensible input and meaningful language support across content areas.

As a TESOL educator, understanding and implementing the SIOP model is essential for effective ESL instruction. The model provides a structured yet flexible framework that ensures ELs have equitable access to academic content while simultaneously developing their language proficiency. By integrating language and content instruction, teachers can create an inclusive classroom environment that promotes both linguistic and cognitive development for English Learners.

The SIOP Model: Components and Structure

The SIOP framework consists of eight interrelated components that guide teachers in designing effective lessons for ELs:

  1. Lesson Preparation
    • Clearly defined content and language objectives
    • Use of supplementary materials to support comprehension
    • Meaningful activities that integrate both content and language practice
  2. Building Background
    • Explicitly linking students’ background knowledge to new content
    • Connecting past learning experiences to new concepts
    • Introducing and reinforcing key vocabulary
  3. Comprehensible Input
    • Adjusting speech for EL proficiency levels
    • Using clear explanations of academic tasks
    • Incorporating visuals, gestures, and realia to support understanding
  4. Strategies
    • Teaching students learning strategies to support comprehension
    • Encouraging metacognitive awareness and self-monitoring of learning
    • Scaffolding tasks through teacher modeling, guided practice, and peer collaboration
  5. Interaction
    • Promoting student-to-student discourse using structured peer interactions
    • Designing opportunities for extended academic conversations
    • Encouraging collaborative learning experiences
  6. Practice & Application
    • Providing hands-on learning experiences
    • Integrating reading, writing, speaking, and listening activities
    • Allowing ELs to apply language skills in meaningful contexts
  7. Lesson Delivery
    • Ensuring objectives are clearly communicated and met
    • Keeping students engaged and maintaining an appropriate pace
    • Aligning instruction with student needs
  8. Review & Assessment
    • Regularly reviewing key concepts and vocabulary
    • Conducting formative assessments to monitor comprehension
    • Providing feedback to guide language and content development

Anastasios Panagiotidis’ Discussion Board provides excellent insight into Building Background.

Screenshot 2025-02-24 at 10.19.52 PM.png

Touro University TESOL Candidate Julia Boris’ Mindmap on NYS Next Generation Standards

Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) [MS]
We offer a Master of Science in TESOL appropriate for NYS-certified PreK-12 teachers interested in expanding their teaching fields to ESL or strengthening their capacities to serve a diverse student body. Evening, Sunday, and online courses are available.

We offer three Bilingual certificate programs to qualified educators and professionals seeking advanced bilingual certification:

  • Bilingual General Education, for mainstream teachers looking to work with bilingual students, teaching their content area in two languages
  • Bilingual Special Education and Speech & Language Disabilities, for special education teachers who want to work with bilingual students
  • Bilingual Pupil Personnel Services, for school counselors, social workers and psychologists, who want to work with bilingual students

All options include field experiences.

Julia Boris is in her third year teaching middle school Spanish to 7th and 8th graders. She is currently working towards her Masters in TESOL education. She loves to travel and learn about various cultures to bring her experiences into the classroom.

Julia Boris created a mind map comparing NYS Next Generation Standards to the National Standards in regards to TESOL Education. The mind map she created explains the differences expected for educators and students and their path to success.

“Touro has inspired me to be the teacher on a journey to connection and empathy. Touro has shown me that the students learn from us as much as we learn from them.”

Julia Boris, Touro University, TESOL Candidate

Alissa Fernstrom – Masters in Literacy Candidate at Touro University on “Elements of Academic Language”

Literacy [MS]
The Master of Literacy program prepares teachers to become Literacy Specialists who work with students with reading and writing difficulties. The program includes ample field experience and leads to certification in both Birth – Grade 6 and Grades 5 – 12. Classes are offered online, as well as on site in Bay Shore in the evenings.

Alissa Fernstrom is currently a Teaching Assistant for a Special Education classroom in the Herricks School District. She completed her undergraduate dual degree in Early Childhood and Childhood Education at Molloy College, graduating in 2018. Afterward, she took graduate courses through Queens College to obtain her Special Education certification before selecting Touro University to obtain her Masters in Literacy. In addition to teaching in the classroom, she teaches dance, which allows her to share one of her life-long passions with others.

Part I

a. Identify techniques for connecting students’ personal experiences and past learning to lesson concepts.

“It is a widely accepted notion among experts that a learner’s “schemata”—knowledge of the world—provides a basis for understanding, learning, and remembering facts and ideas found in texts” (Vogt, M., Echevarria, J.J., & Short, D. J., 2016, p.72). This fact is important to consider as a teacher, specifically of ENL students, because every learner comes into the classroom with their own set of knowledge that can be tapped into and utilized to help them better understand the new content being taught. One technique to connect students’ past experience with new lesson concepts is the use of anticipation guides. These guides consist of a number of statements that students can agree or disagree with based on their background knowledge of the topic being taught. This serves not only to activate their prior knowledge, but also to set a purpose for what they are to learn during the lesson. These questions should also be revisited at the end of a lesson in order to address any misconceptions and help students make new connections. Another technique that should be used when activating prior knowledge is culturally responsive teaching. Since students from different cultures will have vastly different experiences from their peers, it is important to consider that the way in which they will react to new information may not align with the way their peers do. It has been “questioned whether we can assume that students from every subculture will have the same experience with, or emotional reaction to a story or article, or whether we should expect the same outcomes from them” (Vogt, M., Echevarria, J.J., & Short, D. J., 2016, p.73). Teachers must consider that a student’s reading comprehension may be affected by their prior experiences or background knowledge and may not interpret a situation in the expected way. This is why culturally responsive teaching is a very important technique to utilize with ENL students.

 b. List 2 elements of academic language and describe their importance for English  learners.

”Academic language involves the use of more sophisticated sentence structures and forms of expression than are found in everyday conversation” (Vogt, M., Echevarria, J.J., & Short, D. J., 2016, p.76). This language is commonly seen in the content subject areas and leads to academic success. This type of language can be broken down into two specific groups, content vocabulary and general academic vocabulary. Content vocabulary “are the key words and terms associated with a particular topic being taught” (Vogt, M., Echevarria, J.J., & Short, D. J., 2016, p.76). These words are normally found in bold in the informational texts students read about a topic. They also include the words students need to know in order to share their thinking about a topic, such as character and setting. General academic vocabulary “are academic words and phrases students must learn because they are used in all academic disciplines” (Vogt, M., Echevarria, J.J., & Short, D. J., 2016, p.77). These types of words are not normally explicitly taught, but should be since they are words commonly seen in every academic setting. These words may have multiple meanings depending on the content being explored and can cause issues for ENL students. These words also help students to understand how information may be provided to them and how they are expected to interact with it. Both types of academic language are important and should be taught when working with ENL students.

Part II

a. Describe 1 activity YOU used during this week to introduce key academic subject-specific vocabulary for your ENL students. (p 76/77)  divide your academic vocabulary using words from these three  groups: content vocabulary, general academic vocabulary, word parts: roots  and affixes?

This week, I introduced academic subject-specific vocabulary to my 5th grade class, of which one student is an ENL student. We started a new science topic entitled “Got Water?” which focuses on the different spheres of the earth, specifically water. The way in which I introduced these words was by providing students with a list of the words and a picture to accompany each that they glued into their science notebooks. The pictures served as a great way for not only my ENL student, but for all students in my special education room, to create a concrete picture in their mind of what each word meant. Once students had their list, we went through each word one by one, giving students a chance to share their own background knowledge and build upon the definition I had given by using the word in a sentence. This allowed all students to participate and utilize the new vocabulary in a way that was familiar to them. We also talked about the prefixes on some of the words and had students share other words they knew of that started in a similar way. This further helped students to solidify the meaning of these new words.

content vocabulary: hydrosphere, geosphere, atmosphere, biosphere, evaporation, condensation, precipitation

general academic vocabulary: observation, inference, cycle

roots and affixes: hydro-, bio-

b. Describe 1 activity YOU used during this week to introduce general academic or language function  vocabulary for your ENL students (p 76/77).

In our reading unit, students are working on a culminating project with their fantasy novels. The general academic words that were introduced and utilized this week to start this project were compare, contrast, and support your answer. The overall task is for students to pick two elements of a fantasy book and compare and contrast how these elements are seen in the class read aloud and their independent book. In order for students to effectively complete the assignment, they first had to understand what these general academic words mean. I started by simply writing both words on the board and having students use any prior knowledge they had about each word to create their own definition. Since these students are in 5th grade, they had all, including my ENL student, been exposed to these words and were quickly able to come up with definitions as a class. They also identified that we could use a venn diagram to help us compare and contrast the two books. Utilizing charts is a great way to help all students organize their thinking. Finally, we discussed what it means to support your answer. We first compared it to our math lessons when we are always asked to show our work. Students were able to make the connection that the work supports our answer and that in the case of reading, the words in the book are our support. This helped them to realize that supporting their answers in reading meant going back into the text.

c. Use one of the methods described (p 82 – 88) in YOUR classroom and describe what happened – please include a photo of any of YOUR realia/anchor chart/game cards.

The method I chose to utilize with my class is a word wall. A word wall is a place for relevant content words to be displayed in alphabetical order. “These words are revisited frequently throughout the lesson or unit, and students are encouraged to use them in their writing and discussions” (Vogt, M., Echevarria, J.J., & Short, D. J., 2016, p.85-86). I decided that a word wall could be a great way to display our new science words for students. I noticed that once the words were visible to students at all times, they were more likely to use the words when answering questions, not only during our science lessons, but making connections back to them throughout the entire day. For example, students spoke about how our predictions at the end of our chapter in reading were really inferences because we were using what we saw in the book to make a guess as to what would happen. This was so amazing to see as a teacher and hearing students that are both in special education and ENL utilize such sophisticated language in an appropriate way showed me how impactful such a simple vocabulary method could be.

C Vogt, M., Echevarria, J. J., & Short, D. J. (2016). Making content comprehensible for English Learners. (5th ed.). Pearson: New York.

Dr. Cowin’s ‘Language Learning in 2050: A Technological and Cultural Forecast’- a Podcast with NotebookLM

Welcome to my newest exploration: From Research to AI: Language Learning in 2050: A Technological and Cultural Forecast, a podcast where I explore how artificial intelligence is reshaping academic work—not just in the classroom, but in the way we disseminate knowledge itself.

As researchers, we write, analyze, and synthesize ideas, but what happens when we use AI tools to take our work beyond the written word? In this episode, I take you behind the scenes of my latest research on the future of language education – examining how AI, multimodal learning, and cross-cultural adaptability might redefine teaching by 2050.

But here’s the twist: this podcast wasn’t scripted in the traditional way. Instead, I uploaded my work into NotebookLM, an AI-powered tool designed to transform written work into interactive and engaging formats. From text to voice, from static research to dynamic dialogue—this episode is an experiment in what AI can do for academic communication.

Join me as tow AI generated personas not only discuss the future of language education but also reflect on how AI is changing the way we share and interact with research itself. What does this mean for acadmics, educators, students, and the future of knowledge dissemination?

Click the link to listen to this AI generated podcast!

Language Learning in 2050: A Technological and Cultural Forecast

Meta’s End of Fact-Checking vs Plato’s Republic by Dr. Jasmin (Bey) Cowin

On January 7th, 2025, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg stunned the media, the public, and political world by announcing in a Facebook video an end to Meta’s longstanding fact-checking Meta for Media program. Instead, Meta will be implementing “community notes,” a system based on Elon Musk’s user-driven moderation strategy on X (formerly Twitter). Zuckerberg stated in the video, “It’s time to get back to our roots around free expression. We’re replacing fact checkers with Community Notes, simplifying our policies…” read more at Stankevicius:

Cowin, J. (2025, January 13). Meta’s end of fact-checking vs Plato’s Republic. Stankevicius. https://stankevicius.co/tech/metas-end-of-fact-checking-vs-platos-republic/

At the cusp of tomorrow: AI’s 2024 milestones and the 2025 horizon by Dr. Jasmin (Bey) Cowin

2024 has been a transformative period for artificial intelligence (AI), defined by groundbreaking innovations, increased integration into industries, and establishing pivotal regulatory frameworks. Key developments have propelled AI into a new era of operational maturity and ethical consideration. My article explores At the cusp of tomorrow: AI’s 2024 milestones and the 2025 horizon.

Cowin, J. (2025, January 2). At the cusp of tomorrow: AI’s 2024 milestones and the 2025 horizon. Stankevicius. https://stankevicius.co/artificial-intelligence/at-the-cusp-of-tomorrow-ais-2024-milestones-and-the-2025-horizon/

LANGUAGE TRANSFER AND ITS ROLE IN LEARNINGENGLISH: A GUIDE FOR TESOL EDUCATORS (C) by Dr. Jasmin Cowin

TESOL/ENL and EFL professionals, I am pleased to share an infographic that surveys language transfer patterns among five commonly encountered groups in our multilingual classrooms: Ukrainian, Haitian Creole, Arabic, Urdu, and Spanish speakers. Titled Language Transfer and Its Role in Learning English, this visual aid illustrates each group’s potential positive transfers—such as Spanish-English cognates and shared SVO structures in Arabic and English—alongside likely areas of interference, complemented by targeted instructional strategies.

What distinguishes this resource is its in-depth focus on language-specific phenomena. The infographic addresses how Ukrainian speakers, already comfortable with a variant of the Latin alphabet, can make rapid gains in early literacy, yet often need focused practice differentiating English vowel contrasts. For Haitian Creole speakers, cognates derived from French (e.g., enfòmasyon and information) can aid vocabulary development, though the absence of inflected tense markers in Haitian Creole necessitates deliberate instruction in English verb conjugation. Arabic speakers, meanwhile, benefit from certain structural parallels with English but can face persistent challenges with the /p/ and /v/ phonemes; the infographic offers suggestions for minimal-pair drills to facilitate more accurate pronunciation. Urdu speakers may find vocabulary bridges through English loanwords yet need explicit guidance on word order, especially given their SOV home-language structure. Spanish speakers have an extensive network of cognates at their disposal, but can also benefit from carefully designed lessons that address interference in areas such as adjective-noun agreement or false friends.

If you are interested in enriching your understanding of how language transfer shapes English acquisition, this infographic may offer practical insights. I hope you will be able to adapt the infographic to your unique contexts and share reflections or additional ideas for fostering language transfer in action.

#TESOL #EFL #LanguageTransfer #TeachingStrategies

Touro University TESOL Candidate Ivelisse Martinez’s Technology Field Experience on Technology

Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages

New York is a state that speaks many languages. We need teachers who can find the common ground.

The MS in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) Program helps NYS-certified PreK-12 teachers more effectively teach and communicate with a diverse student population.

Academically rigorous and practice-intensive, the 33-credit program includes 5-15 hours of fieldwork embedded in each course

The outlined field experience for EDDN 635 Curriculum Development and Classroom Management in the Technology Era is AI-resistant because it involves components that require direct human interaction, practical observation, and context-specific reflection that cannot be adequately replicated or performed by AI. Here’s a detailed breakdown of why this field experience ensures the authenticity of candidates’ engagement:

  1. Dual Observational Role
    Classroom Observation: Observing educators working with English Language Learners (ELLs) or bilingual students requires attention to the nuances of teaching strategies, classroom dynamics, and student interactions.
    Library Observation: Observing how technology supports literacy development in a library setting involves recognizing non-verbal interactions, how students engage with resources, and the librarian’s role—all tasks requiring human presence and contextual understanding.
  2. Interviews with ICT Specialists and Educators
    Conducting interviews demands human interaction skills, including the ability to ask follow-up questions, interpret verbal and non-verbal cues, and build rapport with interviewees.
    The responses gained from interviews are context-dependent and tied to the unique policies, practices, and challenges of the specific school or district, further grounding the experience in local realities.
  3. Reflection and Synthesis
    Reflection Paper: Writing a paper based on observations and interviews requires critical thinking, personal insights, and the ability to synthesize information from varied experiences. This process is inherently human and tied to individual perspectives.
    Multimedia Presentation: Creating a presentation involves selecting and interpreting data, integrating visuals, and crafting a narrative that demonstrates deep understanding. These tasks necessitate creativity and critical analysis unique to the candidate.
  4. Time Log and Deliverables
    Keeping a time log and taking observation notes are tasks tied to the candidate’s direct presence and engagement in specific activities. AI cannot generate authentic records of these experiences.
    The requirement for notes, interviews, and multimedia outputs ensures that the candidate participates actively and generates original content based on their unique experiences.
  5. Practical, Contextual Learning
    Observing technology use in real classrooms and libraries exposes candidates to the complex, real-world application of digital tools. This type of learning requires adaptability, contextual awareness, and the ability to assess practical challenge.
  6. TESOL and Digital Education Principles
    The experience aligns with principles of TESOL and digital education, emphasizing the strategic integration of technology to meet linguistic and academic needs. Candidates must demonstrate their ability to observe, analyze, and apply these principles in a practical, context-specific manner.

    The EDDN 635 field experience is rooted in direct, human-centric engagement with educators, students, and environments. It emphasizes real-world interaction, critical reflection, and contextualized learning—all elements that demand active participation and cannot be substituted with AI tools. The requirement for personalized insights and tangible deliverables ensures that candidates engage meaningfully, fostering skills and knowledge essential for their professional growth in TESOL and digital education.

Ivelisse Martinez has a bachelor’s degree in Education from Brooklyn College and is currently pursuing a master’s degree in TESOL at Touro University. She is passionate about empowering young learners, particularly those learning English as a second language. Inspired by her own teachers as a child, she sees a reflection of herself in many of her students, understanding firsthand the challenges and joys of learning a new language. As a former ELL, her goal is to inspire and support the next generation of learners on their educational journey.

Teaching is a way of giving back the inspiration and support you once received, guiding others to see their potential and know that every challenge is a stepping stone toward success.

Ivelisse Martinez, Touro University TESOL Candidate